Maps
National parks
Warby-Ovens National Park

Warby-Ovens National Park

View map
Warby-Ovens National Park
Add a sighting Subscribe

Featured sightings

Moderators

become a moderator

Announcements

NatureMapr welcomes Edgar McNamara
Yesterday

We are super proud to welcome Edgar McNamara @edgarmcnamara to the team!Edgar joins NatureMapr as Junior Platform Engineer and will play a critical role in supporting the platform and our valued custo...

Continue reading

Platform wide attribute changes

New Feature: Moderator Quick Responses!

New priority species lists in the ACT

NatureMapr now receives more records in NSW than ACT

Discussion

AaronClausen wrote:
6 Feb 2025
Yep, making a suggestion over the top of an existing verification is in essence endorsing and supporting the moderator's ID. From a platform perspective it is perfectly fine to do and doesn't take away from the quality of the record or the final state of the record that is sent to government data partners etc. The record remains in a verified state as per the most recent verification, which is Darcy's. I see this as Marcycad having given Darcy a pat on the back or a nod of "yep I concur!". Well done and thanks both of you.
Xanthorrhoea glauca subsp. angustifolia
marcycad wrote:
6 Feb 2025
Hi Darcy, I appreciate your message, but I respectfully have to disagree. I believe there is a need to reinforce an identification to a sighting as a means of strengthening the suggested species ID. You will undoubtedly find many examples on this platform, particularly with Xanthorrhoea, a genus of plants that can be extremely difficult to differentiate one species from another, where different users of this platform have applied a number of species to individual Xanthorrhoea sightings. 'Re-suggestion' can only be a positive thing in recognition of an individuals identification ability, would you not agree?
Xanthorrhoea glauca subsp. angustifolia
Darcy wrote:
6 Feb 2025
Fair enough, but you don't need to re-suggest the ID its already got, you can just leave a comment :)
Xanthorrhoea glauca subsp. angustifolia
marcycad wrote:
5 Feb 2025
I was just adding some additional information as verification for those unaware.
Xanthorrhoea glauca subsp. angustifolia
Darcy wrote:
5 Feb 2025
Yeah its not confirmed as X. australis, you've suggested the species its already recorded as
Xanthorrhoea glauca subsp. angustifolia

Species Richness Score (SRS)

Land area

14.7K
ha

Survey effort

0.01
sightings per ha

Top contributors

Top moderators

812,116 sightings of 22,114 species from 13,849 members
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.